Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Roberto Cid Subervi vs Govind Nanda Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Subervi vs Nanda analysis and find out who is favored!
Roberto Cid Subervi vs Govind Nanda Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Subervi has won 50.98% of points on his second serve, while Nanda has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Subervi, in recent form, has won 56.97% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nanda has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.92% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Subervi has saved 53.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nanda has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Subervi has won 68.12% of matches played (W/L 47/ 22), with Nanda winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Subervi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 119/ 81), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Nanda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Subervi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.47% of matches (W/L 40/ 13), where as Nanda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Subervi winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Subervi winning 2 and Nanda winning 0. The last match between Subervi and Nanda was at the M15 Orange Park, 05-05-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Roberto Cid Subervi getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Subervi and Nanda have played a deciding set 0 times, with Subervi winning 0 times and Nanda 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Subervi winning 0, and Nanda 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Subervi has played against opponents with an average rank of 189.99 while Nanda has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Subervi has won 76% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nanda has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Subervi has converted 44.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nanda has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Subervi 1 - 0 Nanda
387
Rank
211
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
835
Rank
339
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
57% (278-207)
Career Total W/L
58% (112-80)
68% (21-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$56,390
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | Govind Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:0 | 1:50:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (35/53) | 61% (42/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (20/35) | 38% (16/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (9/18) | 52% (14/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (39/69) | 45% (24/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | Govind Nanda |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (21/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (44/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (362/289) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 82% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:34 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 246.19 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1390/2035) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (920/1390) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (326/645) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (119/257) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (930/2096) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (14/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (21/31) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (19/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (19/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Ilia Simakin
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
50%
(
66 of
131)
2
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
35 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
45 of
131)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Hady Habib
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Roncadelli
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
91%
(
60 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
0%
(
0 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
14
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Stefan Kozlov
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Keegan Smith
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Govind Nanda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Thomas Brown
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
76%
(
64 of
84)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Govind Nanda
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Isaiah Strode
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Govind Nanda
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Aidan Kim
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Segura
Player
Govind Nanda
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Subervi Vs Nanda Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Roberto Cid Subervi
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
